An Outline of Disability Discrimination Rights of Workers

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYEMENTthe employer at the earliest practicable time; but the
AND DISABLED WORKERS' RIGHTS IN THEemployer of a disabled person must neither fail upon
WORKPLACEsuch knowledge to make reasonable adjustments
(Based on author's siteneeded for the applicant or the employee, nor
The Disabled Persons (Employment) Act 1944disregard in relation to the disabled employee any
requires the employers with twenty or moremedical advice or suggestion.
employees to employ a quota, approximately 30%,In Fozard -v- Greater Manchester Police Authority
of disabled persons, and the Disability Discrimination1997 the applicant had ticked the relevant box
Act 1995 section 4 makes it unlawful for an employerstating that she had a special need of assistance due
with more fifteen or more employees to discriminateto disability which was not given her -it was held that
against a disabled person on ground of his disabilitythe onus was on her to give details of it; the
by treating him less favourably in the arrangementsemployers, the police authority, had not failed in their
made for determining who to employ or in the termsobligations to make adjustments under the Act...
on which to offer him employment or by refusing toIn O'Neill -v- Symm & Co. 1998, the disabled
offer him employment or by deliberately not offeringemployee dismissed for taking time off for
him employment -except where justifiable on groundstreatment which she was entitled to do ought to
of health and safety, and the Act requires theinformed the employer of her condition…
employers to make reasonable adjustments to andIn Tarling -v- Wisdom Toothbrushes 1997 the
at the place of work as and when needed by thedisabled employee had been unfairly dismissed, for, a
disabled employees.needed special chair for back-pain although looked
Disability is defined as being such physical or mentalinto was not bought…
impairment which has a substantial and long termIn Samuels -v- Wesleyan Society 1977 employer's
(twelve months or longer) adverse effect on athinking the disabled employee was unlikely to
person's ability to carry out the normal day-to-dayrecover was in disregard of medical advice to try him
activities -such as walking, lifting objects, speaking,and see if could work.
hearing, seeing, concentrating, learning, understanding.Adjustments by the Act considered reasonable and
The Act does not provide for indirect discrimination,expected to be made by the employer include ramps
and case-law since have been on the lines that therefor wheel-chair users, allocating some of the disabled
is no duty on the employer of a disabled person toemployee's work to another, as needed transferring,
inquire into details of the disability, nor is he at fault inassigning to a different place of work, altering
law for failure to take into account knowledge of theworking hours, allowing absences for treatment,
disability or of the details of it which he neither hasgiving extra training, modifying equipment or
nor ought reasonably to have, and it is for theinstructions or procedures, providing a reader or
disabled applicant or the employee to inform of theminterpreter, and providing supervision.