Health & Safety at Work, Duties of Workplaces & Workers

HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK LAWS, LEGALWorking Time Regulations 1998 prescribe e.g., rest
OBLIGATIONS IN LAW OF WORKERS ANDperiods.
WORKPLACESThere is a health and safety commission, and the
(Based on author's siteSafety Executive is empowered to inspect, issue
The Health and Safety at Work Act and variousImprovement or Prohibition Notices, to prosecute
directives and industrial health and safety regulations-fine or imprisonment.
are increasingly charging employers and employeesContracts of Employment often allow disciplining for
with duties at the workplace.failure in due care.
Employers' legal duties regarding workers and others,Some Related Court Decisions
and employees' statutory duties to employers andHardaker -v- Huby, 1962, said that the system of
fellow workers, make it essential to businesses andwork must be safe.
their workforce to have some appreciation of basicsHudson -v- Ridge MFC Co., 1957, decided it a duty to
of the work safety requirements -and relatedprovide one's employees with reasonably competent
decisions of the courts.fellow employees.
Factories Act 1961 applies where mechanicalWilson & Clyde Coal -v- English ,1938, ruled that the
machinery is used by a business. It requires theduty of care may not be delegated n respect of
workplace to be properly lit, properly ventilated, withensuring by the use of safety equipment.
sufficient toilet facilities. Under this Act movingParis -v- Stepney Borough Council, 1951: the duty is
machinery must have a fence surround; must beindividually owed to employees ~blind in one eye
properly constructed and maintained, e.g., all hoists,should given goggles -usually not worn.
lifts; must be kept unobstructed all floors, passages,James -v- Hepworth & Grandage, 1968: there was
and stairs; floors must not have slippery surfaces,liability for injury to an illiterate who was unable to
and fire-escapes must be provided and maintainedread the signs that warned of danger.
-due care must be exercised to avoid risks beingWicks -v- Charles A Smelhurst Ltd., 1973 ,found it
taken or caused both to and by employees whichunreasonable to expose an employee to risk of
may result in injury.serious injury not contemplated at the time of issuing
Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963 to athe contract.
considerable extent is based on the workingWalker -v- Northumberland County Council, 1994, held
conditions in offices, although it covers also shopsliable for forced retirement on heath grounds of the
railways. It requires rooms not to be crowded, toclaimant kept working at the same place, with the
allow some 3.5m.x3.5m., 12 square metres, floorsame work-load, after he had suffered a nervous
space per person, the temperature to be not belowbreakdown.
16 degrees centigrade, suitable natural or artificialCoulston -v- Felixtove Dock & Railway Co., 1975, said
lighting, suitable and sufficient and easily accessiblethat long-term illness entitled to sympathetic
sanitary facilities with running hot and cold water andconsideration requiring enquiries from the employee
towels.and medically qualified advisors -including employee's,
Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 in section 2as to whether to cease to employ for the sake of
now encompasses the common-law duties; itbusiness was essential.
emphasises the duty to provide a workplace freeWiles -v- Fores (Sussex) Ltd., 1976, thought that if
from hazards, the maintenance and safety ofabsence was disrupting the workplace a reasonably
machinery and equipment -with appropriate e.g.warning might suffice.
warning signs displayed, in liaison with the work-force,Warner -v- Barbers Stores Ltd., 1978, held it failure in
by consultation with trade union Safetydue respect to refuse time off to attend a domestic
Representatives, a health and safety officer on theproblem.
premises who must have regularly updated healthSpalding -v- Port of London Authority, 1977: if
and safety training -including first aid, a Safetybehaviour reasonably jeopardised safety, the
Committee and Written Safety Policy statements; itemployer could issue a disciplinary warning.
requires that the employees too must takeThe health and safety laws charge governments to
reasonable care and co-operate in these respects.ensure compliance by workplaces and workers.
Other Acts, and Regulations -six in 1993 upon EU(This is an outline; laws change, always ascertain
Directives, have been adding to these: e.g., thecurrent law.