Democratic Kampuchea: An Irresponsible Government

IntroductionMen are innately self-centred. Due to thisproclaimed, “more than two thousands year
characteristic, countless problems are flourished, andof Cambodian history has end. A little hostile glance
if there is no any official institution to governinto the politics of Democratic Kampuchea, one
men’s negative nature, the whole state(especially one living outside Cambodia) may think
would steps toward anarchy. Single-mindedly targetsthat Democratic Kampuchea did provide stability to
to offer possible benefits to its people, nearly allthe people, because for nearly the whole of its reign,
government in the world is divided between thethere were no serious internal and external upheavals.
three; executive, legislative, and judicial. ProfessorThis stability was caused by removing all the human
George Mckenna, in one of his excerpts calledrights and even the natural rights of the Cambodian
“Why Government,” claims thatpeople only. Such a compressed stability is not called
government has four basic compulsions to be“genuine stability”, because the
executed (McKenna, 1998, 7).Democratic Kampuchea,government’s deployment of force to attain.
on other hand, drew a completely outlook from whatFor Plato, to attain the stability of the whole state,
Professor George Mckenna has claimed above. All ofeach individual must have stability in the soul as well
the people who have survived the Pol Pot regime(Forsyth & Soper, 1988, p. 24). Imagine, how could
would refer to this government, as not to serviceyou sleep if you didn’t have enough food?
the people, but to enslave its own people, and someHow would you feel if you were convicted guilty
would even depict the leaders as "worse than Hitler"without having a chance to protest back?III.
and a "genocidal maniac" (Chandler, 1999, p.4). AndProviding for The Common Defense?Government is
many have explained the ghost of three; Pol Pot,an aggregate of similar ideology, so that such an
Ieng Sary and Kieve Samphan, as insane philosophers.organization is formed to service the people. James
A confidential CPK document asserted that theMadison claimed that because man is different from
“expulsion of the population from Phnomangel; endless ambition, man is deem to be curiously
Penh is a measure one will not encounter in any otherargumentative. We can draw an equation from this
country’s revolution.” in a similar vein,that, government is supposed to have the same
Ieng Sary told a German correspondent in1976,mentality; one government could invade another
“it is still too early to announce what we aregovernment for beneficial or malicious purpose.As
doing in our country. Since our action is not based onApril Seventeen arrived, government soldiers were
models, we are learning in the course of thetold that the war had finished and all Khmer was to
experiment (Chandler, 1991, p.204).” Probablybecome brothers who should integrate to get
the only government whose philosophy has totallyKampuchea Krom back from Vietnam. And one
molded Cambodian moral/legal/economic system intoSpecial Centre Assembly for Cabinet Ministers and all
a complete earthly utopia, Democratic Kampucheazone/region secretary was held. In that special
draws a lot of curiosity from the world’smeeting, among the eight points stated by Pol Pot,
states and inhabitants.Democratic Kampuchea is theseventh point; expel the entire Vietnamese minority
government that ruled Cambodia from 1975-1979.population, and eighth point; sending soldiers to the
This regime is governed by Pol Pot, Ieng Sary andborder especially to the Khmer-Vietnamese border
Kieve Samphan and other subordinates. This regime is(Ben Kiernan, 1985, p.361-362). Ta Mok added that all
notorious for its “auto-genocide”place that has palm trees, is belonged to Khmer.
which means slaughtering its own people (having theDemocratic Kampuchea constitution, Chapter I, Article
same nationality as the leaders). Democratic1 which stated that “The State of
Kampuchea is considered as one of the weirdestKampuchea is an independent, unified, peaceful,
regimes in the world, due to its destruction of itsneutral, non-aligned, sovereign, and democratic State
own nation and people. For years, the world hasenjoying territorial integrity (Jennar, 1995,
dramatically turned their attentions to this 1975-1979p.83)” also devote to defense Khmer territory
regime. For better understand about Democraticand Khmer people against foreign invasion in any
Kampuchea government, I suggested:David P.form. However, do these all mean Democratic
Chandler (1999). Brother Number One.Ben KiernanKampuchea did response to the third obligation, thus
(1985). How Pol Pot Came To Power.David P.worth called “a responsible
Chandler (1991). The Tragedy of Cambodiangovernment”?If not under any form of
history.Or visit Documentation Centre offoreign pressure, many has come up with a rhetoric
Cambodia.Many questions are still remainedwhy people were forced to bury their heads into
unanswered; why the government killed too manygiant collective farms, in order to attain the yielding
people? Who was/were responsible for the demisespolicy of the revolutionary organization? And how
of over one million Cambodian citizens? How wouldwas the annual farming yield vanished?Democratic
those history traitors be punished? To answer manyKampuchea was deemed to have a lot of similarities
of the questions above, a glimpse into Democraticto the Cultural Revolution of Mao Zedong in between
Kampuchea’s governance would dramatically1966-1976. Those similarities were seen in that Mao
benefit. Did Democratic Kampuchea do anythingZedong forced all the Chinese schools to be closed,
among the four to fulfill what we call the obligationsand after months, he encouraged the Red Guards to
of the government?I. Establishing Justice?The termabolish all the traditional values and bourgeois things, in
“justice” is extremely convoluted toorder to test the party’s followers by
express in words. Socrates, Plato,criticizing them. The commanders ordered their
Aristotle…etc, all have different opinions forsubordinates and soldiers to take control schools,
this term “justice”. Not only amongstfactories and government agencies. Step by step,
the people, different forms of government;this revolution moved to become stricter and stricter.
capitalism, socialism, and democracy, also provideMany elderly people were not only mentally attacked
different perspectives. We could define the wordbut also physically (cultural revolution, internet, p.1-2).
justice by presenting a figure of a blindfold womanOther resemblances were seen in turning all the
with a set of scales. The scales symbolize balanceprivate property into state ownership and the great
and fairness; the blindfold stands for impartialityleap forward approach. Ben Kiernan wrote about
(McKenna, 1998, 7). “Justice does notChinese financial aids to Democratic Kampuchea that;
necessarily mean treating everyone alike; otherwisein September 13, 1975 diplomatic source in Beijing
all workers would receive the same pay and allclaimed that China increased un-aligned financial
students would earn the same grade, regardless ofmilitary aids to Cambodia up to one billion USD and
performance or effort. The impartiality of justice istwenty millions USD as rewards. This was thought as
not completely indiscriminate” (McKenna, 1998,the most impressive aids of China ever been given to
7). For Aristotle’s perspective, just isany country (Chandler, 1991, p.260). David P. Chandler
“the proportional,” meaning that eachadded that; most farmers, happy or unhappy, were
person should be given what is due to him or herowed to their creditor, China (Chandler, 1991, p.239).
(McKenna, 1998, 8).Justice was never been done inMany new people saw the point that they had to
the Pol Pot regime. What Pol Pot had promised thatwork to feed themselves and to increase the
his regime would bring the innovative circle for theagrarian productivities. Such a stance was diminished
people; justice, opportunity for the uneducated andafter the 1975’s output was seen to deliver
the poor, turning elite’s political power intoto far-away unloaded destination by government
people’s hands, etc, were been done verytrucks. In fact, the government delivered thousand
little. On the outset of its governance, Democraticof tones of rice to China to pay the debts. The
Kampuchea divided people into two groups;1976’s finished rice was to be deliver as well,
“base people” and “newbut due to excessive demands from the
people”. This I would call the secondgovernment, starvation became widespread
apartheid, like in South Africa. The new people had(Chandler, 1991, p. 239).All the above evident has
much harsher living conditions and torture, comparedunveiled the Democratic Kampuchea that
to the base people. Even in thehadn’t protect people from foreign invasion
one-party-one-candidate election, base people wereat all. In contrast, people were enslaved to pay the
not allowed to vote at all. Resulting from this, onedebts of the government back to China.IV. Promoting
query has been arisen; why Democratic KampucheaThe General Welfare?Maslow asserted that People
had discrimination on its own people? We can venturedesire for hierarchy of motives; starting from
to answer the question that, because Pol Pot hadphysiological needs to safety needs to love needs,
long had revengeful mentality.For the whole reigningesteem needs, and finally self-actualization needs
period of Democratic Kampuchea, Cambodian people(Myers,1990, 314). Besides the three chronological
were forced to devote their lives to unpaid labourobligations of the government written above,
force to fulfill the earthly “collective agrariangovernment is assigned to be the welfare-supplier to
utopia” policy. CPK soldiers were taught theall the Cambodian citizens. Business regulation, helping
culture of detest toward Royal dynasties,the disabled and orphans in the form of payments or
intellectuals, the rich, and Sihanouk and Lonshelters. For this purpose, varieties of institution,
Nol’s adherents. Over the years, they hasgovernmental organizations, and non-governmental
been trained to hate “enemies of theorganizations have been established to accelerate the
organization” – the Americans, whoprocess. Constitution also claims the role of the
bombed the country, the traitors allied to thegovernment on this goal.Government should be like a
Americans, and the city-dwellers, who had refused totree that unconditionally and tirelessly provides shade
join the revolution. They were taught to relish theirto all who are in need. Or like the parents who cater
resentments; a CPK cadre told Sophy “wecares for the children. Government would always
were so angry when we emerge from the forestheroically venture to sacrifice everything for the
that we didn’t want to spare even a baby ingoods of its citizens, as Buth Savong,
its cradle (Chandler, 1991, p.253).” BeforeCambodia’s Buddhist philosophy scholar,
1977-1978, revenge between classes waswrote in his book called “The Lesson for
widespread. One handwritten document, entitledLife”;In the dry season, absence of wind, in
‘Who Leads the People’sthe middle of field, the heat is enormously high, but
War?’, illustrates the absolute character ofthe tree can still bare such an ordeal
Democratic Kampuchea’s government with arespectfully.Look! Admire the tree that provides cool
veiled reference to Sihanouk:…Therefore theshade to men and animals, always be tolerant to the
only leaders of the people’s war are the layersun’s ray, in accordance to her
of the people who experience the greatestnature.Likewise, the guardian/breadwinner is the
expression, the greatest pain, and have the greatestcomfortable shade of the other, he or herself has to
anger are the most absolute in waging war topossess the quality of endurance, struggle for the
exterminate the exploiting classes, the imperialists,hardship.Admire the parents! Both of them are the
the feudalists and the capitalists. These layers ofguardians/breadwinners of the child/children, how
people are the toiler class. And the highesthave they endured the suffering (Buth Savong, 2003,
Organization, the top general command, the vanguardp.58)…Or like in the book entitled, “The
force, with the boldest line of attack for the toilerTao Inner Peace”, Diane Dreher suggested
class, is the toiler Party, which is adorned with thethe style of leadership through Taoist philosophy. In
greatest brilliance of Maxist-Leninist consciousnessthat book, she stated that leader would resemble the
and endowed with a political line and politicalwater, which is always cool and timelessly
standpoint of serving above all the interests of thebeneficial.“The best people (government) are
producing class, and of the nation...(Ben Kiernan, 1985,like water.They benefits all things,And do not
p.326)In September 1977, Pol Pot encouraged thecompete with them.They settle in low
farming strata of people by comparing them to theplaces,…” (Dreher,
empire of Angkor Wat;Long ago we have Angkor.1990,180).Democratic Kampuchea’s general
Angkor was built during the slaving era. Slaves like uswelfare was far below zero, people were forced to
built Angkor under the exploitation class so the royallive their lives back into the primitive tradition during
people can live in happiness. If our people can builtantiquity.ConclusionGovernment is a mean to an end!
Angkor, they can do anything (Chandler, 1996,There is no need at all, if men are innately insightful,
p.246).All the culture and tradition; language, religion,philosophical, psychologically enlightened. But since
clothing, food, etc, of ethnic minorities and even ofmen are evil creatures, government is required to
Cambodian people were abolished, except the Khmercease the upheavals of the people. The four basic
language was the only cultural item to be retained.duties stated above, is initial answer to the question
Familyism was still seen among the top leaders of“why government?”. Still government
Democratic Kampuchea; relatives of the leaders werehas many more compulsions to be executed to be
not to be evacuated or tortured (Chandler, 1993,worth called people’s government.
p.210). All people were not allowed to have access toDemocratic Kampuchea didn’t fill any among
lawyers or judges at all, they were convicted by thethe four obligations as they did contract with the
Democratic Kampuchea’s soldiers only, thoughpeople, while campaigning for popular support. Such a
Chapter 7, Article 9 stated that “Justice isgang government is not supposed to last long,
administered by people’s courts, representingbecause they deploy forces to make people respect
and defending the people’s justice, defendingthem.Professor Atiyah, in one of his edition called
the democratic rights and liberties of the people, and“Promises, Morals, and Law” wrote
condemning any activities directed against thethat; A human being has only very limited capacity to
people’s State or violating the laws of theimprove his lot in the world when he acts entirely on
people’s State (Jennar, 1995, p.85).II. Ensuringhis own. It is only by exchanging his surplus goods,
Domestic Tranquility?Philosopher Reinhold Niebuhrand the products of his labour, with others, and by
noted that “every community seeksthus joining with them in cooperative activities that
consciously and unconsciously to make social peaceman has been able to create the wealth which
and order the first goal of its life” and he alsosatisfies the wants of human race. No single person
added that “for the simple reason that chaosacting on his own could begin to make
means nonexistence” (McKenna, 1998, 9). Asone-thousandth of the goods which he uses in his
stated above, because men are innatelydaily life-the food he eats, the house he lives in, the
self-important, government is the compulsorycar or train in which he travels to work, are all the
institution to cater domestic tranquility. Madison wroteresult of co-operation by an unimaginable number of
that since men were no angels, we require some kindpeople. So it is easy to agree that anything which
of armed umpire to keep us from harming oneencourages or facilitates human co-operation is, other
another (McKenna, 1998, 9). Professor Georgethings being equal, of great utility (Atiyah, 1995,
McKenna proclaimed that coercion is the availablep.30-31). Democratic Kampuchea government is
source of the government to stabilize the statethought to be full of milk of self-interest; turning the
(McKenna, 1998, 7), and no one can hold this sourcewhole society to fit their needs. Perhaps now we can
besides the government, which is comprised ofventure to answer the question why did Democratic
people. What about the Democratic Kampuchea, hadKampuchea last too short? by using Professor
them done such an obligation?In May 1975, aAtiyah’s statements and because they turn
spokesman of Democratic Kampuchea publiclythe whole society into self-interest.