Prostitution

I must say that the practice of prostitution has beenassault are illegal. It it happens that helping the
given a very bad name. Yet, I see it everywhere.innocent escape an evil fate is pure, it has nothing to
Men who pay for sex are simply either pre-occupieddo with the law. It is legal to help innocent people
or too lazy. If they wanted to save some cash, theybecause it eliminates misery and suffering. So, when
could simply spend 15 minutes everyday groomingwe decide to judge something like prostitution, and if
themselves, and then hitting up the clubs every night.it weighs out to being impure, why should this even
Sure sure, they would be spending about $20 to $40aid in our decision? After all, prostitution, much like
on drinks and maybe three or four hours of hitting onthe sex act alone, creates happiness and pleasure for
a girl, but they would still get sex. And, honestly,many. It is a mutually benefiting relationship. That is
what is the difference between simply paying awhy it must be legalized.There are still some other
woman to have sex, and looking nice and buyingconsiderations to think about. For example, what
them drinks to have sex? I can extend this analogyabout those prostitutes who are not willingly
even further. What if someone decides, in fact, toprostitutes? What of those prostitutes who engage
spend several hours every day or week in courtship,in the practice for the sake of obtaining food and not
for weeks or months, until marriage? In such a case,for the sake of choosing it as a profession? Some
they would have achieved the required social stepswill argue, very rightly too, that prostitution allows
for sex. In that case, they are still just giving in apeople to sell their bodies, even though the practice
certain amount of time and effort to satisfy theirscars their mind. I admit, this is very true. Yet, it
sexual libido. If a man spends hours laboring at hiscannot be denied that every profession contains
profession, is paid, and then spends this money on apeople who are scarred by their labor. Consider the
prostitute, how does this differ from a man spendingMexican laborers, whose rights are violated daily as
hours hitting on a woman and then her finallythey are forced to work 14 hours a day. Consider
accepting the sexual proposal? I cannot find onethe American laborer who lives in a closet and works
difference in any of these circumstances that would10 hours a day so he can have nothing. The decades
make prostitution immoral or unethical.Yes, there isand decades of their lives spent living in such poverty
the difference that in one of these cases, money isand misery, inflicted on the lives of hundreds of
specifically offered for the action of sex. I am notmillions, if not billions, of people. There is no doubt
denying this at all. The only thing I am denying is thatthat professions all over the world have allowed for
the exchange of money for sex matters. Whetherso much misery, so much pain, so much cruelty. They
sex was paid for or whether it was obtained throughexist solely because of the exploitive, oppressive
that clever game of sexual selection and competition,relationships that are allowed to flourish in society.
it is all irrelevant. Just because sex was paid for inThe problem is not prostitution. The problem is the
one instance, I do not think that it ought to bepoverty of a Capitalist economy. If the scarring of
outlawed or even condemned. As humane andprostitution, or any other profession, is to be
rational men, the source of our ethical imperativeseliminated, we need Socialism on our law books. It is
comes from one idea. It is the idea that our actionsthe only savior of the proletariat.Before ending, there
improve, better, and aid the lives of those around us.is one other matter that ought to be discussed. It is
This can be done in a number of ways. If our actionsthe matter of the rights of women, of Feminism, of
can be judged as increasing the pleasure of others,sexism versus sexuality. Feminists will argue that
and decreasing the misery of others, then it ought toprostitution will only make women seem more like
be said that our actions are ethical, that they haveobjects and less like individuals with interests and
done some good, that they have decreased miseryemotions. First, there is a double standard. There are
and increased happines. With this ethical idealgigolos, or male prostitutes, and one might inquire
understood, there can be no argument againsthow this impacts the image that women have of
prostitution. The system of buying and selling sex hasmen. Some might agree, and believe that both
been and will continue to be a means of mutualinstitutions should be abolished. Yet, such an action
satisfaction: the cash for the prostitute, and thewould be too hasty and too reckless. Sex, whether
pleasure for the customer.In all honesty, I believe thepaid for or not, is usually about satisfying an urge. A
greatest amount of opposition to prostitution thatFeminist might as well say that men and women
comes today is simply an animosity against the sexshouldn't have sex with each other at all, to prevent
act in general. Those same individuals who opposethem from having sexual thoughts about each other,
prostitution probably support the law of statutoryor from developing ideas about the other gender. No
rape. They believed that if a consenting 18 year olddoubt, everyone will disagree with such a social plan.
had sex with a consenting 17 year old, that it was aEliminating sex will perhaps cause the greatest misery
tragic act, that it permanently scarred the 17 year oldin society. And, the fact that nobody wants to
and that the heart of the 18 year old was stone cold.eliminate sex, is fair and good evidence that the spirit
The same people who oppose legalizing prostitutionof Puritanism is slowly but surely dying. Whether or
also oppose distribution of contraceptive devices,not prostitution will put a prejudice in the mind of
arguing that "if sex is safe, then more sex will bemen is not something that can be battled by
committed." These people would rather that diseaseprohibiting prostitution, but only by a real and honest
infest and destroy the bodies of young people thaneducation given to all people, so that they can
allow them to take happiness in the warmth of eachappreciate the relationships they have with each
others' bodies. The puritanical spirit is still among ourother.If society were to accept prostitution as a valid
society, unfortunately, and it is the people who areform of pleasure, entertainment, and employment,
paying for it. Venereal disease and unwantedthen the ills commonly associated with it would
pregnancy effects all ages, all races. By doing all thatbecome nonexistent. The disease that is spread
we can to eliminate these social ills, we are elevatingthrough unprotected sex would become extremely
the spirit of humanity, the creed of kinship, the bondlimited and restricted. With regulatory law, these sex
that may be called our experience together.Amongworkers would be required to have protected sex.
the primary arguments of those who opposeAnd, with safe sex, those who purchased the
prostitution, there is the purity argument. It is not aservices of these employees would be safe. There is
question of the disease spread by illegal prostitutes,no doubt that prostitution should be legalized. For
or of the criminal element associated with it, butsome time, casual sex without commitment was a
rather, it is a matter of purity. By allowing people tomatter of law. It was illegal. But today, we are smart
exchange sex for cash, we are allowing people toenough to understand and believe that what two
engage in impure acts, which are destructive towardsconsenting people do behind closed doors is their
themselves. My response to this is simple: irrelevant.business and their business only. It is not a crime to
It is irrelevant whether an action is judged to be puremake awkward artwork or read obscure literature,
or impure. Personally, I believe that allowing childrenbut for a long time it was illegal, punished with death
to live in poverty, allowing armies of unemployed toand torture. Yet as time has worn on, we have
starve, and restricting the flow of information isbecome more humane, more rational, more
impure. It is impure to build palaces when there arepassionate about the rights of the people and the
still men and women without homes. If it was impureliberties of the individual. It is no longer a crime to
to feed the poor and homeless, should we make itread banned books, it is no longer a crime to revel in
illegal? If it was pure to murder and rape, should weobscure artworks, it is no longer a crime to have
make it legal? Of course not. The terms "pure" andconsensual sex. Yet... It is still a matter of law when it
"impure" are meaningless. If conservatives are simplycomes to exchanging sex for cash. As the spirit of
going to apply it without any purpose, then it is withprogress is guided by the flame of reason, we must
complete disregard for morality and the goodness ofchange these laws.w Life,Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff)
mankind.A real question that I would like to ask thesehas been writing essays and poetry on social issues
conservative thinkers is this: by what standard canwhich have caught his attention for several years. His
you define anything as pure or impure? What is thewebsite provides a complete list of all of these
scale? And, once this is decided, how is it relevant towritings. His life experience includes homelessness,
anything? If it happens that murder is impure, thatsquating in New Orleans and LA, dropping out of high
holds no relevance over whether it is legal or illegal.school, getting expelled from college for "subversive
Murder is illegal because it causes suffering andactivities," and a myriad of other revolutionary
misery, and so is the same reason why rape oractions.