Children of Single Mothers Suffer from Poverty When Dad is Absent; Part 3 of 5

It's no picnic for moms raising children in a homeCanada 7.4 50.2
without a father, without the emotional or financialAustralia 7.7 56.2
support. Seems like a big ol' 'Doh'!United States 11.1 59.5
But sometimes, our little minds just can't grasp the*********
reality of a tragic situation -- and believe me, this isOn June 16, 1995 President Clinton requested every
tragic. Even in America, the richest nation on earth,agency of the Federal government to review its
mothers without fathers in the home suffer theprograms and policies with the purpose of
most -- far more than you ever thought.strengthening the role of fathers in families.
Father's historical role in the family has beenHis heart was in the right place, but unfortunately, like
breadwinner. When he goes, so does the financialmost government initiatives, it lost momentum.
stability of the family in most cases. Immediately, theFathering: The Man and The Family is the Department
children of solo mothers (or children whose fathersof Health and Human Services (DHHS) response to
are absent from the home where the mother isthis directive.
responsible for raising them) are plunged into poverty.Their guiding principles are:
Research conducted in 1990 throughout all* All fathers can be important contributors to the
industrialized nations proved that children inwell-being of their children.
solo-mother families are at greater risk of poverty. In* Parents are partners in raising their children, even
places like Australia, Canada and the United States --when they do not live in the same household.
the "more advanced nations" -- more than 50% of* The roles fathers play in families are diverse and
children in solo-mother families are living below therelated to cultural and community norms.
'Luxembourg Income Study poverty line'.* Men should receive the education and support
Other countries implement government policies thatnecessary to prepare them for the responsibility of
do not diminish the effects but alleviate them to aparenthood.
certain extent. Denmark, Finland, and Sweden also* Government can encourage and promote father
have a high percentage of children in solo-motherinvolvement through its programs and through its
families, yet fewer than 10% live below the povertyown workforce policies.
line.These guidelines are great. Recognition, education,
The following table represents the percentage ofresponsibility, encouragement and enforcement --
children who are living below the poverty line,great concepts. But. . .
according to research conducted in 1990-1992.It lacked genuine teeth. If the government focused
*********on the protection of the rights of fathers in addition
to those of the mother, more children would be able
Percent of Children In Povertytwo parent family soloto benefit from the special relationship of 'two'
mother familyparents who care for them and are actively involved
Sweden 2.2 5.2in their lives, even when the two parents don't live
Denmark 2.5 7.3together any longer.
Finland 1.9 7.5And worse yet, radical father's rights groups have
Belgium 3.2 10.0used the directive to ensure less paternal
Italy 9.5 13.9responsibility instead of ensuring greater child benefits.
Norway 1.9 18.4As always, the voiceless children lost. What are we
Netherlands 3.1 39.5to do?