Employment Law - New Legislation - Age Discrimination and Maternity

On 9th March 2006, the government in the UKthat the distinction between 'Ordinary' and 'Additional'
published the final draft of one of the mostmaternity leave has diminished.
important pieces of employment legislation since theThis effectively means that any pregnant employee,
1970s. This legislation came into force on the 1stregardless of her length of service, will be entitled to
October 2006.a full year of maternity leave. The only differences
The legislation applies to employees of all ages, atwhich remain between the two forms of maternity
any point during the employment relationship (fromleave are some slightly different rights on returning to
recruitment to retirement) and provides for thework, but these depend on the length of leave taken
following:by the employee.
§ It will effectively outlaw discrimination on theThe law used to stipulate that if employees wanted
grounds of age.to return early from Maternity Leave, they only had
§ It will outlaw victimisation and harassment onto give 4 weeks of notice. In order to assist the
the grounds of age.employer, that has now been extended to 8 weeks
However, it will also provide a new defence fornotice. It has been commented that one of the main
discrimination: the defence of justification. If it can bedifficulties for both the employer and the employee
shown that the discrimination was a proportionateduring maternity leave is that of keeping up to date
means of achieving a legitimate aim, then anwith important events and work back at the office.
employer can use this defence against a claimThe new Regulations introduce the concept of
brought against him. Interestingly, it should be noted"Keeping in Touch days": This is where an employee
that the government has removed all guidance oncan agree to work up to ten days during her leave
what constitutes a justification defence, but it haswithout it affecting her right to be on maternity
made it clear that a very high standard of proof isleave.
expected.It should be noted, however, that there is no legal
In addition, the age cap for claiming Unfair Dismissalobligation on either the employer or employee to
has been removed, meaning that those over the ageoffer or accept this arrangement, and any pressure
of 65 will be able to make such claims. Also, afrom the employer on the employee may be
retirement age of 65 has been set. Any dismissal forconsidered a detriment, something which the
retirement at an earlier age will be deemed unlawfulRegulations deem unlawful.
unless justified fully. Retirement at 65 will only beAlthough the Regulations have been in force since
lawful if the correct procedure, which includes a 'dutythe 1st of October 2006, they interestingly enough
to consider a request to continue work', has beenonly apply to employees whose expected week of
followed.childbirth (or date of adoption) is on or after the 1st
This process starts with a letter to the employee atof April 2007. Commentators have argued that this
least 6 months prior to the intended retirement datehas been a more onerous requirement on employers,
of the employee. The employee may then ask thewho may have found that a very new employee has
employer to consider allowing him to stay on (this isdisappeared for a year. However, one potential
the 'duty to consider a request to continue work')benefit was that it has ensured that any cover
and the employer must subsequently hold abrought in has had a decent period of time to know
consultation meeting with him to discuss theget to know what they are doing in their new role
employee's future. It is also interesting to note thatwith the employer.
employees will be able to bring claims of discriminationIn addition to the above, the government has also
in all areas of employment including recruitment,made one or two changes to benefit the employer.
benefits, pension provision, promotion and training, asAn example being that the length of notice an
well as dismissal. Also, this is not just a matteremployee has to give if she wants to return early
relevant to older employees: the discrimination againsthas doubled - a change which acknowledges that
any age group will be caught by the new Regulations.employers needs time to make arrangements in such
Commentators have said that the introduction ofcircumstances.
these Regulations is arguably the biggest event inIf you require further information please contact us
Employment Law in the last 10 years, and requires aat or Visit
complete overhaul of all personnel policies, including© RT COOPERS, 2007. This Briefing Note does
Health Insurance and Retirement Ages.not provide a comprehensive or complete statement
In addition, to the new rules relating to ageof the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it
discrimination, there are also new rules relating toconstitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight
maternity leave which came into force at the samegeneral issues. Specialist legal advice should always be
time. The main change which affects employers issought in relation to particular circumstances.