Employment Law Versus Human Rights Law - The Saga Of CCTV Cameras

It comes as no surprise to many that the UK hasCCTV to monitor the actions of employees has
more CCTV cameras per person than anywhere elsepotential implications in respect of the Data
in the world; leading human rights lawyers to warnProtection Act and the Human Rights Act 1998
that their almost constant use in our everyday lives(HRA). If the surveillance is excessive, the implications
raises data protection and wider privacy concerns,may vary depending on whether the employer is a
since they can be used in an intrusive way.public or private body or individual.
But what are the limits? At the workplace, employersIf the employer is a private organisation or company,
are permitted to monitor workers in so far as it isthen direct reliance on HRA is not possible.
necessary and proportionate to the management'sNevertheless, all contracts of employment contain an
reasons. CCTV monitoring is often undertaken forimplied term that employers will not - without
security reasons and is thus widely viewed asreasonable and proper cause - conduct themselves in
reasonable. It follows that employees naturally inspirea manner likely to destroy or seriously damage the
reassurance from their respective employers thatrelationship of trust between themselves and
they are using CCTV responsibly.employees. Yet, it is doubtful that CCTV cameras in
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)obvious places in the workplace would violate this
published its first CCTV Data Protection Code ofimplied term.
Practice in 2000 to help CCTV operators comply withOn the other hand, an employer in a public body has
the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) and follow goodan obligation to respect workers right to private life
practice.under Article 8 of the European Convention on
The Code of Practice: Monitoring at Work givesHuman Rights (as enacted by HRA). However, this
guidance on how to avoid employees calling in theright is a qualified right which means that it may be
lawyers over breaching the provisions of the DPA.interfered with for a legitimate purpose in accordance
The Code provides that before such monitoring iswith law and is necessary in the interests of national
introduced, an impact assessment must be carriedsecurity, public safety or the economic well-being of
out to determine what (if any) monitoring is justifiedthe country for the prevention of disorder or crime,
by the benefits of that monitoring. Under the DPA,for the protection of health or morals, or for the
any CCTV monitoring must normally be open andprotection of the rights and freedoms of others. The
backed by fulfilling reasons.interference must be proportionate in achieving its
The assessment should consider targeting theaim. An example of disproportionate use may
monitoring only at the areas of particular risk,arguably be where cameras are put in toilets or
confining it to areas where people's expectations ofchanging rooms.
privacy would be low, using video and audioUltimately, it should be borne in mind that despite the
monitoring separately - cases where the use of bothpoints outlined there is very little scope to impede
to be justified becomes rare. Its operation shouldemployers making recordings. Placement and
only be where deemed necessary rather thanretention of footage must be in accordance with
continuous - although continuous monitoring may beregulations under DPA. As this is a relatively recent
justified where security is at risk. Finally, whetherdevelopment in the law, there are very few decided
comparable benefits can be obtained by less intrusivecases (the DPA does not apply to individuals' private
methods and what adverse impact it may have onor household purposes).
workers.Assistance for employees comes from either
In making the assessment it is advisable for theexpressing direct concerns to the employer which is
employer to consult trade unions/employeethe easiest way to resolve the situation or from a
representatives.union if the worker is a member.
If the monitoring is introduced to enforce certainAny personal data collected must be stored securely.
rules and standards, the employer must ensure thatAlso, regard should be had to the fact that anyone
the workers are aware of and understand them.who is captured on CCTV will have a right of access
According to one employment lawyer, the use ofto that footage under the DPA.