| | | | | human rights because every person is responsible for |
| In present world there are many communities that | | | | his/her wrong act another concept is that in tribal |
| are passing their lives under inhuman laws in third | | | | culture if a person commit crime only his family |
| world countries as well as in developing countries. | | | | supports him rather than his whole tribe so as |
| Pakistan is also a country which in passing through | | | | Anthropological point of view FCR should be amend |
| the stages of development. The article regards an | | | | that tribal responsibility should be changed to family |
| inhuman law which is applicable to the tribal people of | | | | responsibility and government can arrest his other |
| FATA. | | | | family members and not his other tribal. |
| FATA stands for federally administrative tribal areas. | | | | Another point is that if any murder case happened |
| On the boarder of Afghanistan and Pakistan there | | | | near one’s home that person will be responsible |
| living Pukhtoon tribes in hilly areas which have lack of | | | | for murder. It is clear that each government is |
| social development. There population is about fifty | | | | responsible for the safety of all citizens and no citizen |
| lakes now a day. According to the Constitution of | | | | is responsible for the safety of other citizens so why |
| Pakistan, article 247, Pakistani law is not applicable to | | | | should a government arrest a person for a not |
| the tribal built and FCR should be applicable to these | | | | committed crime. |
| areas. | | | | According to FCR tribal people have no right of |
| As we discussed that FCR stands for frontier crimes | | | | appeal to any court in the country. They can solve |
| regulation. Originally it is a British law which had applied | | | | their disputes under the authority of political |
| to control the tribal people during colonial government. | | | | administration of Pakistani government. So it is also |
| It has 64 articles and most of them are against basic | | | | against human rights because why a person can not |
| human rights while government of Pakistan says that | | | | go to court for his/her rights. |
| these are according to the cultural set up of tribal | | | | Another and last reason for the wrongness of FCR is |
| people | | | | that FATA is under the control of Pakistani |
| Some main points of FCR are as bellow that is | | | | government than why there is different law for |
| against basic human rights. | | | | people of one country. |
| According to the article 40 of FCR if any tribal | | | | We can suggest that Pakistani government should |
| commits any crime his whole tribe will be responsible | | | | amend FCR in the context of present culture of tribal |
| for his wrong act and government can arrest any | | | | people and universal human rights. |
| person of his tribe. So it is clear that it is against | | | | |