Money Laundering

Money laundering is the process of moving moneymultilateral institutions as the World Bank and the IMF
from the illegitimate to the legitimate economy. Thehas been called into question. This tolerance of
crime of money laundering consists of knowinglycorruption has been a highly significant factor in the
disguising the source, origin or ownership of illegalreduced legitimacy of these institutions that have not
funds.been necessarily vigilant in monitoring the diversion of
Any criminal transactions are carried out in cash andthe loans they have made overseas.
the function of the money launderer is often toTheir new emphasis on corruption is an attempt to
translate these small sums into a larger, more liquidreverse this trend. The rise of the Internet and the
sum which will be difficult to trace and more easy tospeed of financial transactions facilitated by
invest. Money laundering has emerged on a massivecomputers have expanded money laundering
international scale with the globalization of the worldopportunities and activities in the latter half of the
economy and the internationalization of organized1990s. There are increasing number of Webs sites
crime.that solicit money for transfer offshore, the rise of
Money earned in one region can, with increasinginternet gambling and of virtual banking have made it
facility, be transferred to another part of the world,possible to launder money without any infrastructure
preventing its eventual recovery by law enforcement.to run or regulate international banking operations.
With the globalization of organized crime activity,Instead, the rise of information technology and the
money is earned in all regions of the world and mustgrowth of untraceable encryption have provided the
be collected, consolidated and moved.possibility of laundering money with greater facility
This growth has been facilitated by new technologies,and with almost perfect anonymity. All that is needed
the increasing movement of goods and peopleis a computer. The rise of the new information
globally and the declining significance of borders. Atechnology has facilitated an incredible
large number of professionals, including lawyers,communications revolution, but it has led to the
accountants and bankers, have emerged to provideproliferation of money laundering in some of the
services to this criminal and corrupt clientele withmost remote destinations in the world. Such locations
large amounts of money at their disposal. Notinclude Vanuatu, Nauru, and the Marshall Islands
involved in the original act, these professionals helpthrough whose "banks" billions have been laundered in
perpetuate criminal and corrupt activities through theirthe last couple of years.
services. Organized crime groups have particularlyFacilitating the rise of virtual banking in offshore
benefited from the expansion of global financiallocations has been the willingness of major banks to
markets. They have exploited the differentialreceive funds that have been routed through these
regulatory regimes and the possibility of movinglocales. While well-written software could screen
money across jurisdictions rapidly in order to hinderthese transactions and prevent the absorption of
detection by taking advantage of the discrepanciesthese funds into mainstream banking centers, this has
between country based regulatory systems.not occurred. The legal institutions to combat money
They seek out locales that are less regulated withlaundering are much slower than those constructed
respect to international anti-money laundering laws.on an order before the information age. Therefore, a
These havens, frequently offshore banking centers,wire transfer which is moved among four jurisdictions
provide both banking and corporate secrecy. Theyin an hour, a typical move for a money launderer, will
also provide secrecy for the trusts, which are usedtake law enforcement in the United States a year to
to hide large-scale assets that are often illegallyunravel because of the need to present documents
diverted from the companies controlled by organizedto four different jurisdictions to obtain information on
crime groups. In 1996 economists of the Internationalthe transaction. Law enforcers in countries without
Monetary Fund (IMF) suggested that 2 percent ofsuch resources as the United States may never be
global GDP (gross domestic product) was related toable to trace these transactions. In some cases, it is
drug crime and the laundered sums associated witheither legally impossible or physically impossible to
corruption and tax evasion would be an even largerobtain needed information on the money movement
percentage. The share of the world's economy wouldbecause of the bank secrecy or the presence and
be even higher today for several reasons as manyprotection of trusts. In the United States, a predicate
forms of organized crime have grown in this periodoffense is needed to prove money laundering.
and the countermeasures have failed to dent theHowever, this requires cooperation of law
profits of this activity except at the margins.enforcement in the source country. In cases where
Much laundered money has been invested in dollarizedthe money is associated to a high level official or his
accounts and other strong currencies where it hasher associates, or where domestic law enforcement
escaped significant losses through currencyhas been neutralized by corruption from crime
devaluations in origin countries. In offshore regimesgroups, that crucial cooperation will never be
where financial capital is untaxed, its growth is fasterforthcoming. In many countries, many categories of
than that of money that is part of taxed andcrime are not predicate offenses for money
regulated regimes. The range of businesses andlaundering or there is an absence of money laundering
financial institutions used to launder money haslaw, leaving many financial transactions outside the
proliferated with the profits and the growing sumsreach of American law enforcement. A novel situation
which need to be laundered. Among the institutionsnow exists.
employed are large banks, offshore banks andThe complexity of the cases of money laundering
financial institutions, currency exchange and wiremeans that the number and expertise of the
transfer businesses, stock brokerage houses, goldenforcement required to address these crimes is so
dealers, casinos, insurance and trading companies.vital that even well staffed American law
The ability to safeguard the proceeds of transnationalenforcement can address only a few major law
criminal activity, tax evasion and corruption haveenforcement cases annually. Furthermore, between
served as significant incentives for the growth of thisthe corruption of domestic law enforcement in many
activity. There is limited risk and few deterrents forcountries and bank secrecy in others, most money
the money launderers and the professionals who aidlaundering investigations are condemned to failure
their activities. The limited seizures that do take placefrom the start. As the amounts of money laundered
are merely "one more cost of doing business." Thegrow, the capacity to address the problem remains
international efforts sponsored by the Organized forperpetually behind.
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) toWhy the current campaign against money laundering?
limit offshore havens and to sanction countries thatA growing consensus is developing in many
facilitate money laundering have yet failed to sharplydeveloped countries that the problem of money
curtail money laundering.laundering must be addressed both within their
Sources of Laundered Millionseconomies and in offshore locations. Much of this is
Laundered money derives from the full range of illicitproceeding on a diplomatic level and is aimed at
activities linked to organized crime such as narcoticsfinancial institutions because the previous legal
and arms trafficking, trafficking in human beings,strategy has inherent limitations. Focus is now on
extortion, gambling, counterfeiting of money andprevention rather than on legal remedies. The present
goods, trafficking in endangered species and stolenmovement against money laundering is the result of
art and automobiles. Often, corrupt governmenta convergence of mutual interests rather than as a
officials move the bribes they have received or theconsequence of a unified view of the harms of
money they have embezzled to offshore locationsmoney laundering. For the United States, the driving
for security. Much of this cannot be treated asforce has been the rise of the international drug
laundered money in many countries because thesetrade, a trade that has enormous financial and social
corrupt activities are not predicate offenses toimplications for the United States. American policy
money laundering.makers have become increasingly concerned that
The need to have a pre-existing criminal offensemoney laundering permits the perpetuation of the
under many criminal codes, is a major deterrent todrug trade and terrorism.
effective money laundering investigations. TheThe possibility to park funds in offshore havens gives
laundering techniques of organized crime groups havethese illicit operators the working capital to
become increasingly sophisticated. Experts areperpetrate and perpetuate their activity. But money
retained who have the capacity to disguise thelaundering is not confined to offshore locales.
source of funds and make them look legitimate. ForAmerican authorities now estimate that US$9 billion in
this reason organized crime groups have increasinglynarco dollars is laundered in New York City and
penetrated into legitimate economies and financialUS$30 billion dollars of drug money is laundered in
markets.Texas. For European countries, the opening of
Such operators have laundered the assets fromborders and the establishment of the Euro in 2002
these diversified investments as well as from thehave placed their territory and financial systems at
original illicit activities. The money launderinggreater risk. The threat of transnational crime is not
associated with high level governmental corruptiononly higher rates of violence, unwanted immigrants
has received more attention in the post-Cold Warbut also large scale financial crime and money
era. Corrupt leaders launder money derived fromlaundering within the European financial system. The
multiple sources: siphoned out of the nationalmovement of capital to offshore locations has had
treasury; diverted from foreign assistance; pay offssevere consequences for Europe's revenue collection.
from foreign investors or contractors working onThe increasing amounts of capital sheltered in
development loans from multilateral organizations andoffshore locations is preventing the collection of
proceeds from privatization.needed taxes, making the maintenance of offshore
The wave of privatizations in the 1990s in manyaccounts an even greater problem for European
parts of the world has contributed to the increasedcountries that need substantial revenues to maintain
deposit of funds in unregulated offshore accounts. Inexpensive social welfare systems and take care of
the transitional period from governmental ownershipaging populations. Therefore, revenue concerns are
to private ownership when there is limitedmore of an impetus for European than American
transparency, many of the insiders have managed toaction against offshore havens.
appropriate significant resources of privatizing firmsWhat is the current campaign against money
and have through elaborate trust agreements,laundering?
consistent with the laws of the locale, parked veryIn 1989 the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) was
valuable national resources in financial tax havens. Theestablished to coordinate a response to the problem
money laundering associated with the privatizationof money laundering. The following year FATF issued
process has also resulted in large and visible cases of40 recommendations against money laundering which
international money laundering investigated such aswere subsequently revised in 1996. FATF, now
the Raul Salinas case from Mexico and the Pavelconsists of 29 countries, and two international
Lazarenko case from Ukraine. Investigations into eachorganizations and represents the larger developed
of these cases, by Swiss and American authorities,countries as well as some of the more affluent
as well as other governments, has totaled in thedeveloping countries. The first recommendation
hundreds of millions of dollars. In the Salinas case, payrequires that countries become signatories to the
offs from drug traffickers were commingled with payVienna Convention against money laundering. The
offs for beneficial privatizations of key state-ownedVienna convention only concerns the proceeds of
industries.money laundering related to the drug trade.
A major question is whether mechanisms will beHowever, it does not include the other serious
made available in the future to deter such depositscategories of crime with which money laundering may
and whether procedures will be established to makebe associated. Consequently, the recommendations
such sums more easily recoverable by the sourcealso suggest that prohibitions against money
country. As the corruption issue is no longer a taboolaundering be extended to other serious offenses.
issue for employees of multilateral financial institutions,This discretion has led to many countries differing
the significant money laundering associated withlegislative measures. Some have not made human
project and structural adjustment loans have becometrafficking, one of the fastest growing forms of
permissible topics of discussion.organized crime, a predicate offense for money
For example, researchers at the IMF nowlaundering. Likewise, corruption remains in most
acknowledge that they could observe the financialcountries, including the United States, outside the list
flows out of Haiti immediately after international loanof many serious crimes, which are predicates to
funds flowed into the country. An investigatormoney laundering.
examining the diversion of a World Bank loan toThe recommendations also deal with measures to
Pakistan traced $30 million to a Swiss bank.identify, trace and confiscate laundered assets.
Increasingly, the investigators of corruption in theseVarious measures must be taken by financial
international financial institutions must be trained toinstitutions to ensure that they maintain proper
find money laundering because both bribe money andrecord keeping, know their customers and keep
actual project loans wind up in the banking centers ofrecords for at least five years time to permit
Western countries.reconstruction of financial transactions. Bank officials
Banks and Other Financial Institutions Engaged inare required to monitor large and questionable
Money Launderingtransactions and to report suspicious transactions to
The types of financial institutions exploited forcompetent authorities without advising the customers
money laundering have proliferated as the reportingin question. These principles are applied not only to
requirements on major banks have increased.the domestic banks but also to their subsidiaries that
Offshore banks have sprung up in many locales toare located outside of the country. Signatory
service the demands of affluent clients who seekcountries are to intensify controls at the borders with
secrecy and an absence of reporting requirements.the purpose of limiting the movement of large
By the end of 1997, offshore locales housed moreamounts of cash. Furthermore, countries are
than half of all cross-border assets held globally. Veryexpected to develop modern methods of money
few countries have been active in taking measuresmanagement such as checks and direct deposits that
to seize laundered assets.reduce reliance on a cash economy. Effective
The exceptions are the United States andregulatory bodies are to be established to ensure
Switzerland. However, the amount they havethat there are adequate measures and sufficiently
managed to freeze and confiscate has been verytrained personnel to realize the implementation of
limited compared to the overall total of illegal moniesthese regulations.
in their financial markets. Many other major bankingRegulators must take efforts to ensure that criminals
centers, such as those located in England anddo not acquire or achieve significant control over
Germany, have thousands of suspicious transactionfinancial institutions. International cooperation must be
reports yet have comparatively few successfulextended as regards to suspicious transactions,
criminal prosecutions or confiscations of assets.confiscation, mutual assistance and extradition.
Therefore, while there are significant risks of gettingCooperative investigations should be encouraged and
caught for smuggling drugs, there is much less chancelaunched when possible. To ensure cooperation
of getting caught and losing the proceeds of drugs oramong states, there must be decisions made as to
other criminal proceeds. Most money launderingthe best venues in which to prosecute offenders.
occurs in offshore banking centers, many of whoseAnnual Reports are issued by the FATF within which
operations are less highly regulated than those inthe country teams have monitored the progress of
major banking centers.member states and issues typologies. The Typologies
Not all-offshore banks are laundering money. TheReport follow an annual meeting in which law
most flagrant abusers are those offshore localesenforcement, legal, financial and regulatory experts
without any financial infrastructure or any regulatorydiscuss recent trends in laundering criminal proceeds,
mechanisms to monitor the banks or to track theemerging trends that arouse concern and
transactions, which pass through their locale. In thesecountermeasures which have proved effective. In
situations individuals and businesses are exploiting theJune 2000, the FATF listed a group of 15 jurisdictions
possibility of bank and corporate secrecy that thesewith serious deficiencies in anti-money laundering
locales provide. Many parts of the Caribbean haveefforts. This "blacklist" was based on extent of
established large legitimate banking services that arecompliance with 25 published criteria.
providing services to a large international clientele ofThree of the fifteen jurisdictions are located in the
legitimate businesses. This offers evidence to indicateCaribbean and include Dominca, St. Kitts-Nevis and St.
that size and location are not absolute determinantsVincent. According to the Annual Report issued at
of whether a financial institution is used as athe same time, the member countries of the FATF
laundering facility for the cleansing of questionablegroup are largely in compliance with the regulations.
proceeds.This evaluation is based largely on the mutual
At present, there are different niches for differentevaluations of the member states. A dichotomy
categories of money laundering. Drug dealers haveexists between the perception of the developed
the widest range of assets to dispose of andcountries and the offshore centers. The tax havens
continuous financial flows, therefore they use allor international financial centers claim that the
available financial instruments. There is significantlegislation and infrastructure are in place and most
differentiation in the market. For example, wiremoney laundering occurs through large financial
transfer businesses are used primarily by street levelcenters. On the other side, the mainland countries
drug dealers, whereas the private banking services ofperceive that money laundering is occurring in
major banks are available only to large-scale clients.offshore locales. The problem remains that money
Offshore banks are used by individuals and groupslaundering persists in both kinds of locales. The FATF
engaged in a wide range of illicit and licit activities.is now turning its attention to such problems as
There are increasing controls on large financialmoney laundering through on-line banking, trusts and
institutions, but recent cases have revealed that it isother non-corporate vehicles, the professionals who
still possible to launder vast sums through majorfacilitate money laundering, the role of cash vs.
banks and through these banks offshore branches.non-cash activities and the money laundering of
Major American banks such as Citibank, the Bank ofterrorists. The FATF is only one of several visible
New York, and Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS), asmultilateral bodies working on money laundering. It
well as their offshore branches, have figuredhas regional task forces that include the Caribbean
prominently in recent investigations of moneyFinancial Action Task Force and Asia/Pacific Group on
laundering. As one of the minority congresswomenMoney Laundering. The United Nations and its Office
on the United States House of Representativesof Drug Control and Crime Prevention (ODCCP) has a
Banking and Finance Committee commented, duringprogram against money laundering.
the Bank of New York hearings, it was the failure toThe Organization of American States (OAS)
sanction Citibank in the Salinas case of drug moneyInter-American Commission on Drug Control, as well
laundering which has perpetuated the problem. Whileas the Council of Europe, have launched special
such actions as a Geographic Targeting Order in theinitiatives on money laundering. Much has also been
New York area has limited wire transfers out of smalldone at the national level. The Bureau of International
businesses, it remains continually possible to moveNarcotics and Law Enforcement of the U.S.
large, questionable and illegal sums through theDepartment of State releases annually its
private banking operations of major banks.International Narcotics Control Strategy,
The profits for the institutions and particularly for theapproximately a quarter of it is devoted to actions
officials of these divisions have made bankers oftenagainst money laundering and compliance with money
turn a blind eye. A recently released U.S. Generallaundering regulations. The report assesses not only
Accounting Office (GAO) report, conducted by thedrug-related money laundering but that related to
investigative branch of the agency, examined theother offenses. A significant group of countries are
possibility of laundering money in the United States.identified as of primary concern based on their failure
The investigators traced US$800 million of such fundsto meet a wide range of criteria concerning asset
that had been moved into U.S. banks by one Russian.and information sharing, as well as the deficiencies of
He did this by registering companies in the "offshoretheir legal framework. Individual countries have
location" of the State of Delaware, which protectsestablished domestic Financial Intelligence Units to
the anonymity of corporations. The money wasaddress problems of financial crime in order to
subsequently moved into accounts in the privateformulate more effective countermeasures.
banking sector of Citibank. No legal action had beenThese countries share some information within the
taken against the banks, any of the account holdersframework of the Egmont Group. This informal
or against the individual who had managed to movealliance includes over 45 countries facilitating the
these funds of unknown origin through the Americanexchange of records and evidentiary materials among
banking system. This investigation reveals howmember states. The United Nations Convention
sophisticated money launderers can exploit significantAgainst Transnational Organized Crime, was signed in
loopholes in United States to move large amounts ofPalermo, Italy by 123 countries (December 12-14,
questionable money through a leading American2000). It contains provisions to combat money
institution.laundering as it is related to organized crime. These
Money Laundering in the Mercosurinclude adequate system of internal regulation within
Money laundering is becoming an increasingly seriousthe signatory countries, cooperation on the regional,
problem in several of the countries of the Mercosur.international and multilateral levels, and the
Part of this is related to the need of Colombian andmechanisms needed to detect the cross border
Mexican drug lords to launder their money, and themovements of capital. Furthermore, it requires
greater facility with which they can do this in Spanishcustomer identification, record keeping, reporting of
speaking countries. It also is due to the proliferationsuspicious transactions. Money laundering in this
of offshore banks in Latin America and theconvention is tied not only to traditional forms of
Caribbean, which now represent 43% of theorganized crime but also to the corrupt practices
international total. The most visible manifestation offacilitating it.
this phenomenon has been the construction of theThe enormous growth of money laundering results
resorts of Cancun that was done with drug money.from several factors simultaneously: the rise of
Yet the use of hotels through which to laundertransnational organized crime, the globalization of
money is not confined to Mexico, as the proliferationcorruption and the competition for capital in an
of luxury hotels in Argentina with limited clientele isincreasingly globalized international economy. The
further visible evidence of this problem. More difficultmajor actors in this essentially criminal business
to detect and investigate is the money launderingpractice are major banking centers and offshore
through the Mercosur banking sector, shell companies,locales, although many other institutions and
commodities brokerages and currency exchanges.businesses participate. The possibility of laundering
A joint investigation conducted by the Brazilianmoney in so many regions of the world has resulted
Federal Police, Central Bank and other entitiesin the massive transfer of resources from developing
reported that between 1998-99, US$18 billion wasand transitional countries to safe havens in the more
laundered through Brazil. Brazilian money launderers,developed countries and more protected offshore
according to the U.S. Department of State, disposelocations.
of drug money and the profits of white-collar crime.Placement of money overseas, allows criminals and
Much of the arms and drugs trade occurs throughcorrupt individuals to evade the control of local
the border town of Foz de Iguacu. The proximity toauthorities, avoid the instability of domestic banking
Paraguay, which is a major money-laundering centerinstitutions while securing access to their funds
for Latin America, exacerbates the problem.internationally. Combating money laundering requires a
Approximately, 20% of Paraguayan money launderingmulti-faceted approach. It is necessary not only to
is related to drugs, while the vast majority emanatestarget the recipients of the laundered money but also
from smuggling and contraband.to recognize the instability of the financial system in
No major scandal has disrupted the Uruguayanthe source country. The capacity of different states
banking system but the dependence of theto combat organized crime and money laundering
Uruguayan economy on its banking sector has failedmust also be enhanced. This is a difficult problem in
to make it very vigilant in reviewing the source ofstates that often do not have the sufficient
client funds. A major money laundering scandalresources to provide for the basic educational,
erupted in early 2001 with the Argentine Central Bankmedical and social needs of their citizenry. The
President Pedro Pou accused of covering up illicit cashinternational actions against money laundering are
being moved through local and foreign banks. He triednow focused more on prevention and sanctions
to hide from the Argentine congress information onrather than the multi-faceted strategies needed to
these illegal transactions. This public scandal emergedaddress the actual causes of the problem.
after a report by an U.S. Senate Subcommittee onPrevention works more effectively in the international
money laundering traced drug money from Citibankfinancial community than in a single country where
back to an Argentine bank. As much as US$10 billioncorruption and coercion by crime groups or high level
may have been laundered through Buenos Aires. Incorrupt officials may prevent the implementation of
response to these problems, the South Americanneeded controls. Sanctioning may work in
Financial Action Task Force (Grupo de Accionembarrassing major banking centers into greater
Finaciero de Sudamerica contra el Lavado decompliance but the enormous profits of private
Avisos-GAFISUD) was established on December 8,banking services make many institutions adhere to
2000. Its member states' include Argentina, Bolivia,the letter but not the spirit of money laundering
Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Ecudor, Paraguay, Peru andcontrols. Their internal audit rules screen out some of
Uruguay. The vital function of this organization is tothe most blatant violators but the proliferation of
improve coordination in monitoring and combatingtrust agreements and front companies make it very
money laundering in the region.difficult to screen clients effectively. Many larger
Why has it been so hard to move against moneyfinancial systems, such as Switzerland, which have
laundering?served as major repositories for drug kingpins,
Until recently it has been difficult to undertakecorrupt officials, and oligarchs are evaluated as in
measures against money laundering due to thecompliance of money laundering provisions.
absence of a necessary political will and theYet they do not provide enough law enforcement
cumbersome international legal mechanisms whichresources to investigate the vast amounts of money
presently exist. Furthermore, the profits of thisand the diversity of actors who are laundering
activity, particularly within private banking, have beenmoney through their financial system. Therefore, the
very lucrative for financial institutions and theprobability of successfully laundering large sums may
registration and associated services. The offshorebe greater and there are many jurisdictions that are
locales have provided an incentive for many localesconsidered medium or high risk for money laundering
without alternatives. Money laundering on a largeby the FATF. In developing countries, which house
scale has existed since the 1960s. Dictators havemany offshore locations, there is desperate
moved money to safe havens and with the rise ofcompetition for capital. Some Caribbean nations
the international drug trade since the late 1960s,suggest that the drive against offshore locations is
there has been an increasing need to move largenot motivated so much by the desire to combat
amounts of money into the legitimate financialmoney laundering but to counter the competition for
system. Covert arms sales have been facilitated forfinancial services. In the absence of development
decades by money laundering. Even though manyalternatives, there is often little incentive to get out
knew this was going on, the fight against moneyof the money laundering business. The sanctioning
laundering has been treated as a secondary concernregime that has been instituted is being executed
to the preservation of influence within a particularwithout equity. Countries placed on the high-risk list,
geographic region. With the end of the Cold War, theotherwise known as the "black-list," by the FATF are
desire to protect certain dictators who were keynot necessarily the worst offenders. Some countries
figures in this strategy collapsed.with very significant problems of money laundering
There was no longer a need to "protect ourhave escaped sanctioning because of their political
dictator," whose corruption became anconnections. Some small countries in the Caribbean or
embarrassment to the states and consequentlyterritories of larger countries do not have the public
multilateral lending institutions. The massive moneyrelations or the regulatory capacity to prevent their
laundering out of the states of the former Sovietsanctioning have been exposed to the full force of
Union, in the 1990s, has revealed that the budgetsthe FATF. Whereas a country like Liechtenstein has
and economies of entire countries can be devastatedthe abundant resources to put towards the hire of
by the ability to launder money to major financiallobbyists to clear its name and also address some
centers and offshore locations. The credibility of suchaspects of the problem.