The Relevance of the Death Penalty

The Relevance of the Death Penaltyyear $75,613.40. To many this may seem like a very
            The death penalty has long beenlarge amount for the state to save. Other's will argue
the focus of many heated debates. When thesethat there is no way to accurately place value on life.
issues arise often times people are biased in theirConsider this, if someone was assaulting a child and a
choice to support or oppose. Some think that life inparent was able to save the child but, would have to
prison is a better option than ending a convictedend the aggressor's life; would it be possible for the
person's life as repayment for their heinous crimes.parent to justify to society and the judicial systems
Others argue that the death penalty is not anwhy they chose not to help due to their inability to
adequate deterrent, a violation of the eighthplace value on life?  That parent who tried to do the
amendment and should be abolished. While addressingso called right thing would be accused of neglect at
the issues of cost, overcrowding of prisons, thethe very least and would be tried in court for their
deterrent effect, and legal aspects, one must alsoactions or lack thereof. Cost has and always will be a
take into account the moral and ethical aspects. All offactor when deciding whether or not the death
these issues must be considered when deciding thepenalty is worth keeping. 
relevance of the death penalty.Moral and Ethical Battles
Deterrence Effect"A man tormented by the guilt of murder will be a
It has been argued that the death penalty does notfugitive till death; let no one support him" (Solomon,
have a deterrent effect on people committing2000). As harsh as this may sound it is found in the
heinous crimes. The most commonly addressedbook that this beautiful country was founded on. The
approach is that criminals do not take the time toreligious beliefs of people often times consume them
think about getting the death penalty when theyand can cause their opinions to be biased. In today's
commit the crime. In rebuttal to this approachsociety the old ways of "an eye for an eye" are
Wesley Lowe states "I wonder how police officersdwindling and policing our own is no longer legal. One
manage to arrest criminals without killing them. Whenmust trust the judicial system to protect them and
a policeman holds a criminal at gunpoint and tells himsentence criminals accordingly. This is a rather
to get on the ground, the criminal will comply fully inchallenging for most people. The victims and the
the vast majority of these cases. Why would theyfamilies of victims want a say in the punishment and
do that unless they were afraid of the lethal powersentencing of the convicted. These situations should
of the gun?" (Lowe, 2010). Lowe makes a valid pointnever be allowed as their judgment is clouded and
in his rebuttal, very few criminals are willing to standobviously biased.
against a weapon that can and will if necessary beIt is the ethical responsibility of the judicial systems
fatal. It is human nature to want to preserve one'sto ensure that every person is considered innocent
own life. When faced with fear of dying most peopleuntil proven guilty. That being said it is the courts job
will make the choice to sustain life.to review any case where the accused may have
Sociologists have argued that the death penalty isbeen looked at in a biased matter. In the case of
not a deterrent due to the following factors in theirRobert Harlan, a death row inmate in Colorado, his
research; states with the death penalty have highersentenced was overturned to life in prison without
homicide rates, in these states the homicide rates didparole. This happened because some of the jurors
not raise when the abolishment happened in 1972,carried Bibles into the jury room and made reference
and a comparison of homicide rates shortly beforeto some Old Testament passages. Harlan kidnapped
and after an execution of a death row inmateand raped a 25 year old woman, Rhonda Maloney,
showing no significant changes (Thio, 2009).for hours alongside the road. Maloney escaped due to
However, Lowe states in his research that betweena Good Samaritan, Jacquie Creazzo, slowing down
1965 and 1980, the number of annual murders in thebecause she noticed the two cars parked on the side
United States skyrocketed from 9,960 to 23,040, aof the road. Harlan chased Creazzo and his victim
131 percent increase. The murder rate -- homicidesMaloney, releasing gun fire into their car. These gun
per 100,000 persons -- doubled from 5.1 to 10.2. Soshots caused Creazzo to crash, as she was struck in
the number of murders grew as the number ofthe face, spine, and knee. Harlan then grabbed
executions shrank (Lowe, 2010). While it is easy toMaloney from the car dragged her back to his. Seven
argue that states with the death penalty have higherdays later Maloney's body was found. Creazzo, the
crime rates most abolitionists do not account for allGood Samaritan, remain paralyzed from Harlan's gun
factors contributing to these higher rates. If theyshots (Nicholson, 2005). Some still believe that Harlan
compare a state the size of Texas to one the sizedeserves to get the death penalty. As unjust as this
of Delaware of course it is going to seem as if theremay appear to many, it is the moral and ethical
is no deterrent. There are numerous factors thatdilemma that the U.S. Justice system has to face.
need to be evaluated in order to accurately debateEvery person has the right to a fair trial, this includes
this point. The size, population, unemployment rates,those that have already been convicted and
subdivisions, racial balance, societal, cultural factors,sentenced.
and much more have to be equally evaluated in orderEnd of the Line
to stand strong in the face of opposition.For many people the death penalty seems like the
Legal and Cost Issuesfinal answer. It will end the criminal's possibility of
In a New York Times article the cost and crowding incontinuing to commit heinous crimes; and possibly
prisons is discussed. Prosecuting a case in pursuit ofhelp end the suffering of the families left behind. With
the death penalty is costly to say the least. Inthis thought in mind, consider the effects the death
Maryland a capital punishment case can cost $1.9penalty will have on the offender's family. They too
million more to seek the death penalty than a casewill be without a loved one and will have to live with
seeking life in prison (Urbina, 2009). This is due to theonly the memories that their love one left behind.
extensive appeals process that the convicted areWhether someone believes in the laws of the Bible
allowed. It has been argued that if there wereor not each supporter of the death penalty is biased
limitations attached to the appeals process that thisin their support. The thought of many supporters is
cost would go down dramatically (Lowe, 2010).that by ending the convicted felons life the world will
Appeals are in place to ensure that the convicted hasbe rid of one less killer and justice will be served to
ample chances to dispute anything that can possiblythe victim's family. While doing this may bring some
prove innocence. The appeal process is often timespeace of mind to the community and the families of
abused to the bitter end as a stalling tactic, as in thevictims, it solves nothing. Killing one person for their
Michael Ross case. Michael Ross had accepted hiscrime of killing is in fact the old "eye for an eye"
sentence of death and had stopped submittingmentality. Life in prison without parole may in the end
appeals. However, his lawyer and a few other peoplecost more and seem like a lighter penalty, but the
had suspicions of Michael's state of mind andconvicted is removed from society for life.
psychological wellbeing; Michael's execution came to a 
halt close to an hour before his lethal injection was to 
take place. A temporary stay of execution was 
granted until May 11, 2005. After being evaluated 
Michael Ross died by lethal injection on May 13, 
2005 (Unknown, 2010). This man made the choice to 
stop his appeals and accept his fate; due to thisWorks Cited
unusual behavior the judge, lawyers, and even prisonLowe, W. (2010, March 05). Pro Capital Punishment.
staff questioned the man's mental stability costing allRetrieved February 12, 2010, from WeslyLowe.com:
involved even more of tax payers' dollars.Nicholson, K. (2005, December 20). Killer Harlan Gets
The amount to house and protect an inmate differsLife Without Parole. Denver Post , pp. B-01.
in each state. In Colorado the average cost for allSolomon. (2000). Reflecting God Study Bible, Proverbs
services provided per inmate a year is $37,806.67.28:17. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
Colorado currently has two inmates on death row.Thio, A. (2009). Controlling Deviance. In A. Thio,
Considering the cost to house, feed, protect, andSociology A Brief Introduction 7th ed. (pp. 156-158).
clothe these two inmates if Colorado was to enforceSan Francisco : Pearson.
the sentence of death, the state would save in one